Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have sparked a wave of controversy in Colombia, where their recent visit has led to widespread criticism among citizens.
Many Colombians are questioning why they should bear the cost of the couple’s visit, particularly since Harry and Meghan no longer officially represent the British monarchy.
The visit, seen as a private endeavor, has left many citizens frustrated, especially as reports of high security costs funded by Colombian taxpayers have emerged.
Comments from Colombian citizens reflect anger and disbelief. Many have labeled the couple as “good for nothing” and “parasites,” questioning the merit of their visit and its benefits to the country.
Some have pointed out that Meghan Markle’s display of wealth, with over £72,000 worth of outfits on her first day alone, feels tone-deaf in a country where most citizens will never see that amount of money in their lifetime.
The resentment stems from the fact that Colombia is one of the poorer nations, and taxpayers feel burdened by covering the costs of security and other expenses related to the visit.
One of the central complaints is that while Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could afford to pay for their own security, they have instead allowed the Colombian government to cover the costs, which many find unacceptable given the economic challenges the country faces.
Additionally, there’s frustration over the couple’s diminished royal status, with some citizens pointing out that Harry renounced his official role in the monarchy, yet is still benefiting from royal privileges.
The visit has also reignited discussions around the Colombian government’s priorities, with some citizens accusing the government of diverting attention from more pressing national issues by focusing on hosting the high-profile couple.
The criticism highlights a deep disconnect between Harry and Meghan’s perceived wealth and privilege and the economic struggles of ordinary Colombians.